Skip to main content
BoF Logo

Agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice for the global fashion community.

Europe Agrees to Drastic ESG Cuts After US Pressure Intensifies

The European Union reached a tentative deal to slash ESG requirements, as the bloc faces intensifying pressure from the US to rein in such rules amid ever-present trade tensions.
European Union flags outside a grey building.
A European Union law designed to clean up corporate supply chains has been derailed by some of the bloc’s biggest member states, forcing negotiators back to the drawing board on one of the most consequential pieces of ESG legislation ever attempted. (Shutterstock)

The European Union reached a tentative deal to slash ESG requirements, as the bloc faces intensifying pressure from the US to rein in such rules amid ever-present trade tensions.

In late-night talks, representatives of member states and the EU parliament agreed to wind back the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive so that over 80 percent of the companies originally intended to be in scope will no longer need to comply. A preliminary agreement was also reached on other EU requirements around environmental, social and governance standards, broadly in line with cuts set by lawmakers last month.

The agreement reached, which also scales back the scope of the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, represents an effort to “boost competitiveness and cut red tape,” the EU Parliament’s legal affairs committee said in a statement.

But there are already signs that the rollback will be seen as inadequate by the US. That’s because of the continued extraterritoriality of the rules, which require large non-EU corporations to comply if they do business in the bloc.

ADVERTISEMENT

A spokesperson for Exxon Mobil Corp. said even after the agreed watering down of CSDDD, the concern is that the EU “didn’t go nearly far enough,” in comments sent via email.

“The ability of Brussels to regulate a US company’s operations anywhere in the world remains and this is completely unacceptable,” the spokesperson said. “The Trump administration has made clear this is a non-starter for trade talks and we look forward to a common-sense resolution in the near future.”

Representatives of the government in Washington, DC, have repeatedly made clear that the EU will face American displeasure until the issue of extraterritoriality is tackled. President Donald Trump’s envoy to the European Union, Andrew Puzder, said net zero and due diligence requirements on oil companies “make it very difficult” for them to supply Europe with the energy it needs, in an interview with Bloomberg Television’s Francine Lacqua on Friday.

The decision to wind back ESG rules comes as Europe struggles to keep its economy on track, with energy bills up roughly 60 percent since 2020 adding to the burden on households and businesses. In response, policymakers have launched a wide-reaching process of simplification, targeting both CSRD and CSDDD, which encompasses supply chain rules, in order to ease requirements.

The agreement “is a welcome step towards cutting complexity,” said Oliver Moullin, managing director for sustainable finance at the Association for Financial Markets in Europe, in a statement. “Clear, workable rules will support the mobilization of finance for the transition while minimizing unnecessary regulatory burdens and supporting competitiveness.”

Environmental nonprofits, meanwhile, voiced their discontent.

“This compromise remains an alarming dismantling of good policymaking and removes some of the most important tools Europe had at its disposal,” said Richard Gardiner, interim head of EU Policy at ShareAction, in a statement. Dropping climate transition plan requirements and EU-wide civil liability “weaken Europe’s competitive edge.”

The Details of the ESG Agreement

Monday night’s agreement between lawmakers and member states means that CSRD will only apply to companies with at least 1,000 employees and annual revenue of €450 million ($523 million).

ADVERTISEMENT

CSDDD will no longer require companies to produce climate transition plans. Meanwhile, companies will be required to focus on ESG vulnerabilities in supply chains where relevant.

A clause on extraterritoriality remains part of the agreed text.

In their rush to address complaints, European policymakers have also faced criticism from within, with European Ombudswoman Teresa Anjinho last month finding “shortcomings” in the legislative process that “amounted to “maladministration.”

The deal now needs to be formally approved by member states in the EU Council and by the European Parliament in order to become binding law.

By Frances Schwartzkopff and Ewa Krukowska

Want to dive deeper into an insight from this article? Check out The Brain of Fashion, BoF’s new generative AI tool where you can unlock BoF’s sustainability archive with a single question.

Further Reading
In This Article

© 2026 The Business of Fashion. All rights reserved. For more information read our Terms & Conditions

More from Sustainability
How fashion can do better for people and the planet.
view more
Latest News & Analysis
Unrivalled, world class journalism across fashion, luxury and beauty industries.

Can Big Luxury Find Its New Look?

Sex sells — if anyone can figure out what sexy means in 2026. Robert Williams tracks the search for a new silhouette at Kering’s Gucci, LVMH’s Dior and more.


Estée Lauder’s Surprise Acquisition, Explained

The American cosmetic giant’s buyout of Ayurvedic beauty line Forest Essentials came as a surprise. By picking an under-the-radar brand it knows well, the company can show that it’s still in the M&A game without needing to outbid rivals.


VIEW MORE
Agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice for the global fashion community.
CONNECT WITH US ON