Skip to main content
BoF Logo

Agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice for the global fashion community.

Italian Regulator Fines Giorgio Armani €3.5 Million for Unfair Commercial Practices

The fashion group and one of its units ‘issued misleading ethical and social responsibility statements in contrast with the actual working conditions found at suppliers and subcontractors,’ Italy’s antitrust regulator said.
A Giorgio Armani store in Berlin, Germany.
A Giorgio Armani store in Berlin, Germany. (Getty Images)

Italy’s antitrust regulator has fined fashion group Giorgio Armani and one of its units 3.5 million euros ($4 million) for alleged unfair commercial practices, it said on Friday.

The Giorgio Armani group rejected the accusation and said it would appeal.

The regulator said in a statement that the two companies “issued misleading ethical and social responsibility statements in contrast with the actual working conditions found at suppliers and subcontractors”.

It added that Armani outsourced most of its bag and leather accessory production to these third parties.

ADVERTISEMENT

The authority said that although the group emphasised its attention to sustainability - using it as a marketing instrument - the external suppliers, in turn, subcontracted to other producers, which in some cases employed workers illegally and in poor health and safety conditions.

The issue already came up last year with Italian prosecutors, who placed one of Armani’s units under judicial administration, a measure which was then lifted in February.

In a statement the Giorgio Armani group expressed “disappointment and bitterness” at the regulator’s decision, adding it would appeal it before an Italian regional administrative court.

“(The group) always operated with the utmost fairness and transparency towards consumers, the market, and stakeholders, as demonstrated by the Group’s history,” it added.

Last year the competition authority opened a similar investigation into LVMH-owned Dior to assess whether it had misled consumers.

The French brand agreed a number of remedies in May to settle the probe, considered by the regulator as appropriate and enough to avoid any sanctions.

Earlier this year also cashmere king Loro Piana and a unit of luxury brand Valentino were put under judicial administration in Italy over worker abuses in supply chains.

By Elisa Anzolin, Philippe Leroy Beaulieu; Editors: Giulia Segreti, Frances Kerry

ADVERTISEMENT

Learn more:

Are Luxury Brands Responsible for What Happens in Their Supply Chains?

An Italian union is seeking to hold Richemont legally accountable for alleged workers’ rights violations at a Montblanc supplier, as scandals linking brands like Dior, Armani, Valentino and Loro Piana to sweatshops draw more scrutiny to the sector’s sourcing practices.

In This Article

© 2026 The Business of Fashion. All rights reserved. For more information read our Terms & Conditions

More from Luxury
How rapid change is reshaping the tradition-soaked luxury sector in Europe and beyond.

Swatch Group vs Morgan Stanley: It’s Time for Transparency

After Swatch Group launched an attack on Morgan Stanley’s influential annual watch report, Swatch-owned Tissot cracks open the door for a glimpse at some numbers and Robin Swithinbank says it’s time a secretive industry came clean on financials.


Is Armani Any Closer to a Stake Sale?

Half a year after Giorgio Armani’s death, it appears to be business as usual at the sprawling fashion empire while potential investors continue to circle with no firm bid in sight.


view more
Latest News & Analysis
Unrivalled, world class journalism across fashion, luxury and beauty industries.

Estée Lauder’s Surprise Acquisition, Explained

The American cosmetic giant’s buyout of Ayurvedic beauty line Forest Essentials came as a surprise. By picking an under-the-radar brand it knows well, the company can show that it’s still in the M&A game without needing to outbid rivals.


VIEW MORE
Agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice for the global fashion community.
CONNECT WITH US ON